This may seem to be the answer to many prayers: the speed of
machine code by writing Basic. But life is never that simple.
If it was, we would all be writing chart-toppers.
The problem is that this can only cope with a small subset of
Basic keywords. The manual claims it covers 65, but even to do
this you must write in a particular way. For example, a MOVE
statement must first be translated into VDU statements which
may not be easy if you don't usually use this method.
That understood, this is a very compact and fast compiler which
does all that is claimed. The manual is well-written although I
didn't find the disc instructions very easy to understand. The
subset is reasonable and the code you produce can be used
without compiler in memory.
The demo program shows another problem, though. The machine code
version of the first part is no faster than the Basic one, and
the second doesn't even run in Basic as it was written in a
special way so that the compiler could make sense of it!
The machine code version of the first program is no faster than the Basic one, and the second doesn't even run in Basic as it was written in a special way so that the compiler could make sense of it!
Screenshots
Logout
Are you sure you want to logout?
Create Auction
If you auction an item, it will no longer show in the regular shop section of the site.